Result

The Conservatives have withdrawn the whip from Derek Conway.
Well done Dave, you've shown your worth.

Is Dave dithering?

Here is a wonderful opportunity for Dave to show his mettle. If he withdraws the whip from Conway he establishes clear blue water between his party’s attitude towards sleaze and that of Nulab. Why does he hesitate? After all, the whip can be restored if Conway is exonerated.

Come on Dave, show us, and the country at large, that the Conservatives won’t tolerate even the suggestion of sleaze.

Despatches last night

Was at 8.00 pm not 9.00, but I still watched it.

No killer blow sadly. The most damning charge was that Satan used taxpayers’ funds for party purposes; but this is not a charge that will resonate with most people. For the rest Ken’ll be able to shrug the charges off.

Damn, I really wanted to see the man squirm, however I suspect he’ll have woken this morning feeling relieved.

One bright note however is that the programme may have raised the perception of sleaze in the public’s mind. If the programme convinces 10% more people to vote for Boris, or discourages 10% of people from voting for Satan that’ll be enough to get Boris the job.

I really hope so anyway.

Despatches to reveal the truth about Satan?

9.00 pm Channel 4 tonight - Despatches, compulsory (and arguably compulsive) viewing for anyone who gives a fig about London. If the pre broadcast hype is to be believed Satan will be exposed as a drunk, a bully and a supporter of a secretive Trotskyite cabal who seek to establish the Soviet city state of London, using taxpayers’ money to fund their evil plans.

I intend to watch and will cheer every time Satan is shown to be abusing his powers, misusing taxpayers funds etc etc.

It’s not that I hate Satan; it’s just that he’s an anti-Semitic misogynist who hates personal choice and who operates according to the politics of envy so beloved of his scummy party. May he return to hell shortly to stay there forever.

OK I lied; I hate him.

Long live Boris.

Ken tells (more) porkies

Well done to Andrew Gilligan and Ross Lydall for again exposing Satan (aka Ken L) as a liar. According to The Standard a committee of MP’s, Labour, Lib- Dem and Tory have said he has “mislead the public” regarding the enquiry into the money his mates were given by the LDA.

Ms Featherstone (Lib-Dem) said: "Ken has no shame. It is almost as if if he shouts loud enough he makes what he is saying true, but the evidence shows that what the Mayor has said is not true."

Now let’s hope that the whole affair is exposed in the rest of the MSM so that finally London will be rid of this oppressive evil regime.

Hain apologists

Newsnight last night. Some Labour apologist (Lucas?) appeared and tried to defend the indefensible. Part of his defence was to claim that 3 helicopter trips made by Cameron, all duly declared in at least one of the two places it should be (members interests and electoral commission – I forget which) was just as bad as Hain’s undeclared receipt of £103k.

Sorry, am I missing something. Cameron declares the trips at the time to the authority he believes needs to know, while Hain “forgets” to declare to any official body an amount equal to 125% of the amount he did declare.

So, in his mind, declaring funds (or benefits) on time to the authorities equates to keeping secret donations received until you’re forced to reveal them. Well, it’s an interesting take on honesty, one well in tune with Labour thinking. After all laws (note 45 Govt) don’t really need to be applied to Nulab and its cronies

He also claimed that Hain had volunteered the information. Here he’s on stronger ground given that he’s probably using voluntary in the same sense that it’s used for ID card purposes i.e. you have no choice it’s mandatory.

Newlabourspeak has begun. Voluntary means compulsory, honesty means dishonesty; let’s just hope that “the Prime Minister’s full support” means what I think it means.

HAIN - Brown says his fate is not in my hands

Well yes it is actually. You are Prime Minister after all, and last time I checked the PM can decide who is and isn’t in his Cabinet.

That said what is all the debate about. He broke the law therefore he should resign, failing which he should be sacked. What’s to talk about?

Joined up Government

So Labour has suggested that the voting age be lowered from 18 to encourage participation on politics.

They also propose increasing the age at which you leave education to 18.

So what they’re saying is that these teenagers are fully competent, capable people who are sufficiently mature to take decisions on who should run the country, but who are incapable and insufficiently mature to decide when they should leave school, or indeed, smoke.

So are they adults or not? Come on Comrades decide one way or the other.

Commie shits.